🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils is set to be slashed by more than half, after a divisive law change that required municipal councils to submit the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments could only establish a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a community referendum in their region. Local populations often devoted considerable time building community backing and urging their councils to create Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to set up a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating communities should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had established a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics however have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and says it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

The results of the referendums were divided down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

The recent local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to create different wards – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The different conditions placed on Māori wards indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that chose to keep their seats.