🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in an organized professional network test this week after popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."