🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold forecast – going beyond the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible where yesterday went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner gained 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump last year went for Zohran this year. But it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass half. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added all of these conservatives on Staten Island who had a high participation. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. However overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So I don’t know if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.